Saturday, December 12, 2015

Book Clubs of Tomorrow

      
Growing up, I always dreaded the third Thursday of every month because I knew I would be spending a night with my dreaded babysitter, Carissa. Carissa was the type of high-schooler who thrived on the power to control innocent children to do her chores, microwave her dinner and clean her room. I spent hours trying to convince my mom to stay home, but I always failed, receiving the same monthly response. "I'm sorry, Justin. You know I have book club."
I assume that I am not the only child who experienced something of this nature. Everyone had his or her own version of “Carissa” due to a neighborhood book club. Now that I am older, I understand the value of book clubs- everyone reading the same piece and gathering to discuss the ups and down and deeper meanings. Book clubs used to a social morn, specifically for women. It was a chance for them to leave the kids with a babysitter and get together to discuss the latest bestseller or a treasured classic. Men partook in the activity as well, often discussing murder mysteries or political nonfiction in my dad’s case. Despite the valuable discussion, book clubs are becoming a rarity with many shifting to online discussion boards or forums.
This argument is further discussed n Print is Dead: Books in Our Digital Age where author Jeff Gomez states:
“Just about every Web page you visit that has any appreciable amount of content on it provides a feature where you can email it to a friend. Blogs allow users to subscribe to their sites via RSS feeds, syndicating their content throughout the Internet and the world…share in an experience (which hundreds if not thousands of other also sharing)…This is the kind of discussion that used to happen between friends or family members who have read the same book,” (159)
Overall, the concept of the book club is still alive, but the intimacy and personal connection between people has been lost. If someone wants to comment on a book, all he or she has to do is go online and find a chat room that is discussing the book. Furthermore, this process has gotten the author more involved in the dialogue. Authors not only participate in these forums, but they also take suggestions from readers, developing fan fiction into bestsellers, such as the Fifty Shades of Grey series. While this is becoming more convenient for readers and authors, publishing still needs to find a way to get involved with the discussion before it is left out of the conversation. Without being present for these online message boards, publishing companies may lose their voice. The book club is just another example of how technology and the digital age are changing the way book are published, read and perceived.

Social Media: A Lack of Privacy

Social media is without a doubt the addictive of the 21st century. People of all ages participate in the online phenomenon, spanning from Facebook to Instagram to Tumblr and every website in between. While most people use these sites without a second thought, there is one thing that should be on every user's mind: privacy. Or...a lack thereof. The following are a few points highlight common user errors that are a result of a lack of knowledge in terms of how much privacy social media holds.

       1) People forget that once they post on social media, it stays on the World Wide Web forever.

There is no backspace to the Internet. Even when something appears to be off of your computer screen or no longer on your Facebook wall, it is still out there. Someone may have taken a screenshot and saved it on their computer. Someone may have saved the IP address. Even if you did manage to take down the information, it is still floating around in the unknown world of the WWW, something that very few people tend to remember. Someone out there can still access that deleted information, even if the original post appears to have been deleted. In addition to this, people often agree to have their information shared or their name used without even knowing it. The following is an example of the fine print of Facebook, something that most people do not even think twice about reading: 

This is just one example of how the inforamtion you share is not entirely yours, and you often do not have control over who sees it or uses it once it is posted. 

       2) People do not think long term about the impact of their social media posts.

I'll be the first to say, I have posted some questionable things on social media. Whether it was a strong opinion or a picture that made it look like I was in the wrong place at the wrong time, most people tend to have some regrets about their social media posts. One example is posting a picture where you appear to be intoxicated on social media. Let's say you are a 20 year old girl having fun at party, drinking lemonade out of a red cup and someone snaps a photo and posts it on Facebook. Even though you weren't drinking under age, it may appear that way. Many company search Facebook and other social media sites when looking for new hires. If they see that you were "drunk" underage, they may be less likely to hire you. In any case, most people post thinking only about the present, when social media has a great impact on your future.

       3) People post before they think.

This goes along with the last point, but continues to deeper meaning. Many people will post their thoughts or pictures to appear "cool" or make themselves a part of conversation. People want to post anything and everything that they are doing, searching for self-reassurance through likes or comments on social media. By doing this, many poeple sometimes post information or pictures that should be kept private, not thinking about the consequences of the post. If people are under the influence of alcohol or drugs, they may post something that they would not normally post. Bad news- once it's out there, it is out there for good.

Friday, December 11, 2015

The Evolution of the Reader

Throughout this semester our class has been interested in the amount of change that is taking place in book and print culture. At the beginning of the semester, I assumed that this change would only affect the industry and the people involved in print careers; however, these technological changes and innovations affect anyone who reads in four specific ways:
First, readers are more on-the-go than ever before. Everyone needs 25 hours per day, so in order to get information, readers turn to apps, headlines, and notifications to get news. If something is happened a day ago, it’s old news. Because of the increased culture of skimming for news and information, readers have developed a shorter attention span. Very few people sit down for four or five hours at a time to read a book or an entire newspaper. For this reason, the printing world has been forced to adapt, creating more online blogs and apps to spark reader interest. The concept of “close reading” is dwindling, not only because of the change in print culture, but also the society that is causing those changes.
Secondly, there has been a drastic rise in eBooks. This is in response to advancing technologies, as well as the capability for readers to hold thousands of books on a singular, compact device. Bookstores, such as Barnes and Noble, have been forced adapt, creating brands, such as Nook, to offset the lack of sales and participation in hardcopy print. eBooks became extremely popular, causing a decrease in book sales. Many bookstores have closed some of their stores, such as Barnes and Noble, while others, like Borders, have shut down completely. eBooks are often cheaper than printed versions, and most of the time they are cheaper. For example, this summer I read Happy by Alex Lemon. I tried to buy it at a local Barnes and Noble, but the book was not in store it would cost around $15 to ship to the store or to my house. Instead, I chose to download it onto my iPad via iBooks, which only cost me $6 and no time.
Due to a rise in eBooks, the way readers read these books is also changing. There has been a rise in online discussion boards, chat rooms, and comments. The idea of a traditional book club has become a rarity, because it is much easier to type out your thoughts online and immediate receive opinions from people all around the world. Furthermore, this has increased the concept of “fan fiction.” Authors have started to use these discussion boards to create new pieces, making these accessible discussion more valuable to authors, while a traditional book club may be more valuable to the reader.
Clearly, it seems that eBooks and online reading have overtaken the printing culture. Despite this, the is a new group of readers that just might save the printing world, known as hybrid readers. These are readers, for whatever personal reason, purchase both printed books and digital books. According to an article published (online) by Alexandra Alter of The New York Times, eBook sales are in decline, and the print industry is back on the rise. The article states:
E-book subscription services, modeled on companies like Netflix and Pandora, have struggled to convert book lovers into digital binge readers, and some have shut down. Sales of dedicated e-reading devices have plunged as consumers migrated to tablets and smartphones. And according to some surveys, young readers who are digital natives still prefer reading on paper,” (Alter).

In my opinion, readers still aren’t sure what they what. It seems as though that print culture may not be dead yet; however, the industry will need to adapt to regain the success of the past.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Q & A with Alex Lemon

Author Interview with Dr. Alex Lemon

Alex Lemon is a writer, editor, professor, husband, and father. The following interview is a look into each of these aspects of Alex's life, inspiration, and efforts to balance it all. 

1. Who or what inspires you as an author?
I think at a basic level, just reading and writing as I grew up. I was raised in a house that did not have a lot of media. We didn’t have TV or movies. I was reading a lot. First and foremost, I was inspired by books, just seeing books around me and hearing stories. My mom is an artist, so I think being around a creative imagination inspired me not only to think about how amazing storytelling is, but also how amazing it is to create your own stories. Seeing my mom do that through her own art was inspiring.

2. Who or what motivates you as an author?
I think first and foremost, I have to write. I am compelled, for whatever reason, inwardly to always be creating. Even though it’s incredibly hard, it feels not only powerful, but also really important that a writer can create hugely important and life-changing things out of nothing. You don’t need a computer, you don’t need tools, you don’t need oil, and you don’t need a machine. Stories can move people to their core. They can change people’s lives. First and foremost, I am compelled inwardly. For whatever intangible reason, I have to write. Now, there are external motivations too. It’s part of my job. I’m sure there are cultural influences that are motivated by the success of my peers. I also just want to get better at what I do each day. 

3. What author[s] or book[s] influenced you as an author the most?
It depends. I work in different genres, so it depends on the genre. For poetry, I think I was first moved by reading the work of the early modernists or the people right before the early modernist- authors like Dickinson and Whitman and Stephens. Also, contemporary poets like Yusef Komunyakaa, Nick Flynn, Brenda Shaughnessy, and even now Terrance Hayes. I have three copies of Some Ether, Nick Flynn’s first book. I can pick it up and read a poem from it, and it will make me want to write. It will inspire me to write. The same is true for prose writers. For writing memoirs and creative prose, I think I am inspired a lot by the fiction of Dennis Johnson. The memoirs of Mary Carr have been really influential to me. Also, the contemporary prose of George Saunders, both his fiction and his nonfiction.

4. Most often, where, when, and how do you write?
It’s changed, as I have gotten older. When I was in graduate school, it was my computer in my bedroom and I would stay up all night. I wouldn’t sleep at all. I would write late at night. I would probably start at 8pm and then write until 3 in the morning, all the time whenever I could. Now because my life is so different, I actually get up really early in the morning. I had an office at home, but we are having another baby, so our son now has my office and the baby is going to have her own room. Right now, I feel kind of homeless as a writer. I am writing with a laptop on the kitchen table. I get up at about four in the morning and work until somebody wakes up, usually Felix. I make sure to start my day that way because it feels like a positive force to be able to privilege myself and my creative work, but it also informs everything that I do. It informs my teaching; it informs my parenting; it informs what kind of partner I am- all in really positive ways. Before you came in, I was revising a poem. I used to need lots of sustained hours and hours and hours to work. Now my life is so fragmented and I’m being pulled in so many different ways that if I can get twenty minutes here and there, I can work on poetry. It’s different for creative nonfiction and prose. I need blocks of time. I can work in the mornings often because I’ll have a couple hours to sink into the project. I need no distractions to write creative prose. With poetry, I can kind of have distractions. I think that’s why there is something similar to writing all night long and then working in the morning before anyone is up. It’s totally quite; there’s no one in the world. It feels like I am the only person alive in the world. So maybe I’ll get four hours on Saturday when Felix and my wife go do something; I’ll have four sustained hours. Really, a lot of my creative prose gets written during breaks, longer periods of time like summer or on vacations. 

5. How is technology changing print culture, specifically regarding authors and readers?
In tons of ways, in both good and bad ways. There are so many more venues for publication. Let’s say we are talking about literary journals. So many more poems and stories are being published and so many more people are reading them because it is so easy to get access on your phone or the web. When it comes to book publishing, I think we are still in this muddy area where people are trying to figure out what to do and how to do it. I think in a lot of ways, it’s meant authors are making less money for books. It’s a hard thing to answer. There are stats that fewer people today are reading. I think Dr. Williams told me only 40% of college graduates will ever read a book again after they graduate. That is so depressing!! A part of me thinks that technology is killing the book in a way because it’s really privileging the image. We are becoming a more and more visual culture. Pretty soon we aren’t even going to talk to each other. We are just going to make faces; it’s all going to be like emojis or something. In some ways, I think that it’s awesome. There are so many more opportunities and there is so much more for people that are interested, but it seems like less people are interested. That is sad. I think it also opened opportunities for people that want to write because it’s easier to communicate with editors and publishers. It hasn’t figured itself out yet. I think it has tremendous amount of potential, but it also ahs the potential to kill everything that’s ever happened. Technology is changing so rapidly, that the answer is not going to happen over night. We have to adapt and think about how we are going to adapt. People are getting more comfortable reading on tablets or iPads. I think because of the print culture for poetry, poets will always buy books. I think that will always be the case. I wouldn’t be surprised, especially with trade books and genre books, if more people buy them on Kindles and iPads. I buy more books or check out specific books from the library because I can download them digitally; however, the some books that I want to have. I want to hold the substance. If I’m traveling, I’ll read on an iPad for sure. 

6. When you write, who is your intended audience?
I don’t think I have a specific audience, especially when it comes to my poetry. I don’t think about audience at all when it comes to my poems. Hopefully, I am exploring something personal in a way that makes the personal transcend and become public. I think for my memoirs and creative nonfiction, it is for specific audience. I think about audience. I think about if I am articulating this story in a way that makes sense to people. Who are those people? I guess it depends on the project. My first memoir, Happy, I definitely wrote for young people. It’s a young-persons book. I did not write that book for my grandfather to read. It is a book about a young person’s experience with life and depression and trauma, and it is for young people. I am working on a book about fatherhood right now, and somewhere in the subconscious I am thinking about talking to other young fathers, but I don’t think that’s at the forefront. I think privileging what is important to me comes in first, and then the audiences come later during the editing. I never think, well I guess I have, I want to write a book that cross audiences. It’s going to be teenage, lesbian, vampire, magician, and school- like I want it to cross all and sell a billion copies. So, joking I have talked about audience, but I don’t think it play a big role in what I’m doing. 

7. What would you say is the hardest thing about writing?
Time. I think to write the way I want to write, to write well, I have to spend a lot of time doing it. The world that I live in, the life I have created does not always allow that time. I have to go shopping…I have shit I have to get done. As much as I want to be like, “Oh my art is sacred,” I also have to make sure that my family is alive. That is a struggle. I can kind of joke about it, but I’m starting this book project and at the core it’s trying to figure out if being the father that I want to be is compatible with being the artist I want to be. Maybe it’s not. Maybe I can’t be the dad I want to be, if I want to be the writer I want to be, or vice versa. It’s a really, really hard thing to think about. Anytime I’m hanging out with my family, that’s time I could be writing. That makes me really sad to be honest with you. It’s hard. 

8. How is the current technological revolution changing your audience? 
I think that more people are able to read. Technology has made my work available to a wider audience. Every semester I probably get ten emails from high school kids that are working on a project and they are either talking about a poem form one of my books or my memoir. They write me. That would not have happened when I was in high school. I couldn’t have done that; there wasn’t email. I also think in some ways, it is easier to print books. It has also changed writing process. I use a voice recorder, much like you are using right now. I don’t have to keep my notebook with me at all times. I can just turn something on and make voice memos to myself if I’m feeling lazy or driving somewhere. I always put it down in my notebook, eventually. I also have a visual disability and I didn’t really relearn to write with a pen or pencil after I had brain surgery, so I used voice-recording software for a long time to take notes in my early writing. That is just something that I have stuck with 

9. What do you think reading and authorship will look like fifty years from now?
I hope people are reading. It had no idea. Technology or information doubles every four years. We could be downloading stories…there will be stories. There will always be stories in the form of…who knows. They will always be. Maybe we will be downloading them into our brain chips. Even though society has been regressing artistically in an ugly way, everything right now is focused on business; I think there will be a pushback. There is always an ebb and flow. I think it will all still exist, but who knows what kind of technology will be bringing stories to people. In the same way there is a hipster resurgence of vinyl, there will always be fine pressed books and limited edition books for a certain segment of culture. I think they will always last

10. How did you find a publisher, and how long did that process take?
My first book of poems, Mosquito, was published in 2006 with Tin House Books. I found my publisher because I started publishing individual poems in literary journals in 2004. I was also awarded some nationally recognized fellowships, and usually editors of publishing houses care about book. They are reading. The editors at Tin House had read my poems in other publications, and then they solicited work from me. They asked me if I had any poems for their magazine. I sent them poems, and they like the poems. That led them into asking if I had a manuscript because they were just starting Tin House books at the time, and they wanted to have a poetry collection. The process from me starting to publish poems to winning awards and grants was a three-year process; I was very fortunate. For the memoir, I had been publishing books of poems that were getting recognized at a nationally level. Through conference and friendship, I had been meeting agents as friends, and through conversations I was having with some of my other author friends they asked if I was ever thinking about writing a memoir. I hadn’t really thought about it, but I started to free write and doodle ideas and started to feel more and more compelled to write the memoir. I began to navigate through my poetry in prose. I used friendships and networks to communicate with agents. I sold Happy as a proposal; it only had about twenty pages. I was given three years to write it, but I got a contract up front and in advance. That process probably took five years in total. 

11. How much did your manuscript change during your publisher’s editorial process?
For the memoir, it changed from being just twenty pages of notes with a few scenes diagram and fleshed out with an outline of where I saw the book going to an actual book. It fluctuated from twenty pages to a first draft that was 400 pages and a hot mess to subsequent thinner and thinner drafts until the final project. Because I had been trained as a poet, I had to learn how to write clearly in a way that could be received by a more general audience. Poems are like reading and speaking a different language. It changed tremendously from notes to a huge, ugly thing and back down. My poems- my first book was edited pretty heavily from the line level, going line by line, to the book as a whole, the ordering of ideas. My most recent book, I had a paragraph of thoughts and that was it. I don’t know why that is. I’m just aware of that huge difference. 

12. Do you have a definite and specific organization and structure in mind as you begin writing?  If so, how definite and specific is your outline?
It depends. For my poems, the imagination is open. I may have an image in my mind or a line or a few words or a turn of phrase. I might just kind of go with it and see what happens. For my creative prose, I have an idea. It’s still kind of wild and organic, but I have an idea about what I am writing about. It’s much more defined. Using Happy for an example, I knew what the story was. I don’t know necessarily all of the little stories that need to go in to telling the big picture. With poems, I’m really just finding a way to open the door into a dark room and then feeling my way into the room, feeling the room and trying to see what’s there. I really have no idea where I’m going. Only through revision and spending time with it can I revise or more clearly articulate what I found in that room. 

13. How would you describe your writing process?  
It depends on the genre and focus. Writing memoir is more guided and more focused, I know what I’m doing. With verse, I don’t feel like I know what I’m doing at all. 

14. Do you have any writing habits or rituals that help your writing process?
**Did not ask because this had already been addressed

15. Do you write in multiple genres?
Yes. Poetry and creative nonfiction. I’ve ben writing a little bit of fiction, but it’s not as fun. I’m just not as compelled I guess. I’m lucky that I feel like working in poetry and creative nonfiction that inform each other in positive ways. 

16. What was your first publication, and what do you think of this publication now?
My first publication was a poem in our college literary magazine. It was really surprising because nobody on campus knew. I was a guy that played baseball and hung out with jocks. I had six poems published in this magazine, and people shit their pants. In college, my first publication was a poem called “Love is a Very Small Tsunami” in Black Warrior Review, and then my first book publication was Mosquito with Tin House Books. I am fond of them today. I am such a different person today then when I wrote those poems, but I still like it. I’ll go back and read them and I’m energized in a certain way because there is a certain wildness that I probably don’t have anymore. There is certain strangeness because I didn’t know what I was doing, so I just went. There are also some really ugly lines and clunky turns of phrase that I wouldn’t do now. So, I am fond of it. I adore it, but I am also embarrassed by it. 

17. Have you ever started writing something and ended up throwing it out?
All the time. You have to dig through the manure to find the diamonds. I feel lucky if I write 24 lines and a few of them are good. I have had huge projects that I’m 60 pages into and then think, “ew this is not good.” I think that is just part of the writing process. One has to have that filter.

18. Besides teaching and authorship, have you had any other jobs in the writing field?
I edit. I work as the editor for the literary journal, and I am the poetry editor here. I am also an editor for a book publisher, a small poetry press called Saturnalia Books. I serve on the Texas Commission for the Arts. I work with funding writing projects. Every year, I usually judge a couple on contests and serve on other literary committees. Last year I served on the Oregon State Commission for the Literary Arts, so I judged who got the grants for the year. I try to be as active as possible in promoting the arts and working in other ways. 

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Why eBooks are Here to Stay


               In class this semester, we have thoroughly discussed the possibility that printed books are on their way out. Barnes & Noble is continuously closing stores around the country. College textbooks are losing value because of the ever-growing presence of online textbooks. Bookshelves around the nation are losing significant, while millions of files are being downloaded everyday. As an English major, I obviously have a lot of opinions on the current shift taking place in the book and printing culture, and they are not as negative as one might think they would be. The following are three takeaways from class and my personal life about why digital books are improving the reader’s experience.

1.Digital books open a world of endless possibilities
·      I’ll admit it. I have converted to eBooks in my personal life. I use the standard app on my iPad, iBook. There are several reasons that I like iBook. First off, there are thousands upon thousands of options to purchase books at the tip of my finger. All it takes is a quick search and press of a button. This summer I read Happy by Alex Lemon. I searched three different bookstores, none of which carried the book in stores. Instead of waiting a week to have it shipped to the store or my house, I downloaded the book on iBook in about 30 seconds. My dad owns a Kindle, as does my aunt. They are able to share their purchases, providing each of them with double the amount of books. Not to mention- it’s easier to carry around my iPad Mini than 25+ hardcopy books. My backpack is very much appreciative of the eBook phenomena.

2.Digital books are greater resources than hardcopy books.
·      How many times have you been reading a novel or textbooks and come across a word that is completely foreign to you? Often times readers do not take the time to put down the books and pull out a dictionary or Internet search to research the definition. With an eBook, the middle step is taken out. In iBook, I just have to highlight a word and click “Define” and the definition pops up right on my screen. The same can be said for most eBooks, also providing thesaurus, highlights, and note-taking tools. I take a lot of notes when I read, and it is much easier to do so using an eBook than a hardcopy. I am able to highlight a word without it bleeding through the page and write in a “margin” that is legible and neatly organized and does not clutter the page. Overall, I have found it easier to learn while reading an eBook.

3.Digital books are often cheaper.
·      While this is not always the case, I have often found the eBooks are more affordable than hardcopy. For example, Happy (previously mentioned) was around $13 plus shipping at Barnes and Noble or Amazon. On iBook, I was able to download it immediately for $6. In my experience, popular books or brand new works may be closer to the same price; however, the eBook price is often considered a better opportunity cost because it does involve shipping, waiting on a book, driving to the bookstore, etc. The download is instantaneous. Additionally, many eBook companies often have a list of free downloads. While these are often unknown novels that do not have a lot of interest, there is potential that the reader reads a book that he or she enjoys at no cost. I have friends who only read the free books; they find new interests, and often an entire series will be available to download for free. In my opinion, eBooks provide more benefits for a lower price than hardcopy books.

While I love snuggling up in bed with a cup of coffee and good book, I have substituted my original copy of To Kill a Mockingbird with a digital copy. There are certainly benefits to sticking with hardcopy, something I have done with college textbooks. Despite the longstanding success of the printing and publishing industry, I believe that print culture is going to continue to change, shifting toward online and digital and the primary, preferred method for readers.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Books: A Pathway to Free Thinking


            One simply cannot argue the fact that books provide knowledge, instruction, and understanding. While in today’s world books are typically viewed as a positive influence on society, this was not always the case. Back in the Dark Ages and in the early 16th and 17th centuries, many viewed books as dangerous because they might lead to free thought. While watching the film The Name of the Rose, I began to think about my own reading experiences. Is it possible that reading can actually be dangerous in today’s society?

            In The Name of the Rose, reading was very limited. The Bible was one of the only books that people were allowed to read, specifically the monks in the monasteries, or the abbey. While the abbey was home to one of the world’s greatest libraries, the books were locked up where only the head librarian and his assistant were allowed to read them. There was a fear that the monks’ minds would be poisoned by the content, veering their minds away from God’s teachings. This can be compared to “banned books” lists that are in many schools today. One example of this is the Harry Potter series. Many parents believe that the content of the novels (witchcraft, magic, elves, etc.) causes the children’s minds to be corrupted. Despite this, I do not think that the banned books of today are as extreme as the restrictions of the Dark Ages depicted in The Name of the Rose.

            In terms of my own reading, I do not think that books should be banned or restricted, except maybe X-rated material. In my opinion, books are a gateway to positive change. Andrew Guzaldo says, “Books are only but a mirror of what knowledge we desire, in our minds and in our hearts.” I can relate to this quote because of my relationship with books. I often read books that are of interest to me or related to something that I am learning. If books were difficult to access, then it would be more difficult to receive some knowledge.


The argument for banning books with violence can attempt to be made. Perhaps if a child is not allowed to read about guns and murders than maybe he or she will be less likely to grow up to be a killer. If books with drugs and alcohol were banned, maybe that would create a positive correlation for a child’s future. Despite these types of claims that seem to be in line, I think that it does not make logical sense to put blame on a book. Books open doors to learning; the reader decides what actions to take based on the gained knowledge. While books may hold the power to put negative thoughts in someone’s head or exposure unpleasant images, the ultimate power of the books lies within the reader.

Writing on the Wall: A Problem with Social Media


           160 characters. That’s all you get to tell the world your extreme political opinions or your wild Friday night out with the girls or your intense addiction to Netflix original Orange is the New Black, at least on Twitter. Twitter is just one of several social media outlets that consume people’s lives. A main source of information, news and sharing, social media sites like Twitter have conjured a following unlike any other area of business…. and I don’t believe this is something to be proud of. In this blog, I am going to highlight three “positives” of social media that were discussed in class and explain how they are actually negatively affecting society.

Social media connects people.”
·      Although social media connects people, we are losing our lack of personal intimate relationships. 
·      Social media is creating a wedge between how we connect - its harder to connect in person because its so much easier to connect via device rather than taking the time to meet up with an actual human being.
·      It is also creating a lack of connection with the world around us. Instead of looking up and meeting new people and connecting with the culture of places, we want to take pictures or text who we already know about what is going on rather than talking to someone new and learning about new ideas and people.

Social media is the easiest way to share things.”
·      We are losing our patience. We want things fast and don’t think on a deeper level because we are quick to write something and send it or post it instead of take the time to think about what we are reading/sharing.
·      There is a lack of privacy. We share so much that we lose intimacy; things are shared so easily that it's not safe. People can hack into media, and it’s all so new that we really don’t know all that can be “stolen” from us through what we post

“Social media is the best way to get information.”
·      We may be able get news quicker and stay connected with the world around us, but social media has altered us from observing what is around us to being glued to lit up screens.
·      Social media increases the ability for false information to be sent out and spread quicker than someone can spit out the facts and correct any untrustworthy data
·      Social media makes us lazy. We would rather read a 140-character tweet than read full details in a paper or magazine. We are at full mercy of the sites we are using to get our information rather than taking the time to research for the facts.